Writing a Cold Email That Earns a Reply

Alexander Chua
8 min
Writing a Cold Email That Earns a Reply

The short version

  • Templates optimise the opener because that is where the writer feels anxiety. The ask at the bottom decides whether anyone replies.
  • A meeting request is a large ask: a calendar block, from a stranger, for a benefit not yet agreed. Shrink it and reply rates move more than any subject line test.
  • The opener has one job: prove a human looked. Ninety seconds of research beats any personalisation token.
  • Under ninety words. Length is a promise about how much effort the reply will take.

Cold email templates fail in a specific way. They optimise the wrong sentence.

Almost every template you can download spends its energy on the opener, because the opener is where the writer feels the anxiety. Meanwhile the ask at the bottom, which is the sentence that determines whether anyone replies, gets copied from the last template unchanged.

Why is the ask the whole email?

Read the last cold email you sent and find the final sentence. It probably proposes a fifteen or thirty minute call, sometimes with two time options, sometimes with a calendar link.

Now consider what you are actually asking. A stranger should give you a scheduled block of their week, on the strength of four sentences, for a benefit they have not yet agreed exists. The size of that ask has almost nothing to do with fifteen minutes. It is the commitment, the calendar entry, and the small social cost of cancelling if they change their mind.

The askCost to the readerWhat it produces
”15 minutes on your calendar?”A commitment plus cancellation riskLow reply rate, only in-market buyers
A yes/no question about their setupFour wordsA thread
The asset itself, not a meeting about itOne wordA thread plus a qualified reader
”Worth me sending the two-page version?”One wordPermission, then a warm second email

All three of the cheap asks start a thread, and a thread is what you wanted. The meeting comes from the thread, not from the first email.

What is the opener actually for?

Once the ask is right, the opener has one job: prove a human looked at this specific company.

Not personalisation tokens. Every buyer can spot a merge field, and a first name in the greeting proves nothing. Proof of looking means a detail that required someone to spend ninety seconds. A job posting, a specific page, a change in their pricing, something a colleague said on a podcast.

If you cannot find that detail in ninety seconds, the contact is wrong for a low-volume, high-research programme. Either cut it or accept you are running a volume play and be honest about the economics. There is more on the mechanics in the cold email opening line problem.

Length is a promise about how much effort the reply will take.

How long should it be?

Under ninety words. Not because attention spans are short, but because a long cold email signals that answering it will be work.

What to remove

The paragraph about your company. They will look you up if they reply. Until then it is a cost.

Social proof that is not a peer. Naming a logo three sizes bigger than them reads as a mismatch, not credibility. Name a company that looks like theirs, or name nobody.

“Just following up.” It says nothing and admits the previous email failed. Send a new thought instead, or send nothing.

What should you measure?

Replies, not meetings.

Meetings booked from a first email is largely a measure of how many recipients were already in market, which is mostly outside your control. Reply rate is the part your writing moves.

The reply you get will often not be a yes. It will be a correction, a redirect to a colleague, or a question. All of those are the programme working, and all of them are how a conversation starts. How this fits a small overall budget is covered in B2B demand generation without a big budget.

Frequently asked questions

Why do cold emails not get replies?

Usually because the ask is too large. A fifteen-minute call means a calendar block, a commitment, and the social cost of cancelling, given to a stranger on the strength of four sentences. Reducing the ask moves reply rates more than any subject line test.

What should you ask for in a cold email instead of a meeting?

Something answerable in a few words: a yes or no question about their setup, the asset itself rather than a meeting about it, or permission to send something. All three are cheap to answer and start a thread, and the meeting comes from the thread.

How long should a cold email be?

Under ninety words. Not because attention spans are short, but because length signals how much work the reply will be. A long email promises a long response and gets postponed into never.

Does personalisation actually improve cold email reply rates?

Proof of research does. Merge fields do not, because every buyer recognises them. A detail that took ninety seconds to find, such as a change on their pricing page or an unusual pattern in their job postings, is what proves a human looked.

What should you remove from a cold email template?

The paragraph about your company, social proof from a company three sizes larger than the recipient, and any follow-up that opens with 'just following up'. Send a new thought instead of announcing that the previous email failed.

Should you measure cold email on meetings or replies?

Replies. Meetings booked from a first email mostly measures how many recipients were already in market, which is largely outside your control. Reply rate is the part your writing actually moves.

Sources

  • Chua Network delivery data across 8 client accounts (internal fact bank)
Alexander Chua

Alexander Chua

Co-Founder, PipelineRoad. Building companies and observing the world across 40+ countries. Writing about company building, go-to-market, capital formation, and the lessons in between.

More about Alexander

Newsletter

Chua Network Letter

Occasional essays on company building, global observations, and clear thinking. No spam. No SEO bait.